>>> On Apr 6, 2009, at 2:14 PM, Wichert Akkerman wrote: >>>> >>>> This is possibly a valid concern for us as well. I wonder if there is >>>> room for optimization here - our startup time is already quite slow.
Yeah, I've heard reports of autoinclude being slow (though I haven't experienced it myself) and I have a pretty good idea why. This came up a little over a month ago on zope-dev: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2009-February/034846.html (and the following thread) I haven't had a chance to follow up or take any action on this, but if this is a blocking concern for Plone 3.3 I can try to implement a first pass optimization in the coming week. If anyone else wants to take a stab at it first, I outlined my thoughts at http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2009-March/034874.html The most time-consuming thing here will likely be getting a good test case to demonstrate worthwhile speed improvements, rather than the code itself. I'm thinking I'll try it with z3ext. egj _______________________________________________ Framework-Team mailing list Framework-Team@lists.plone.org http://lists.plone.org/mailman/listinfo/framework-team
