Greetings, Frameworks-

I haven't been very active on the list lately, but I was pleased to see 
Critical Commons included in this discussion. I have administered this site for 
the last 14 years without ever removing a single uploaded video in response to 
a copyright challenge or DMCA takedown.

Critical Commons was originally funded by the MacArthur Foundation in 2008; it 
now runs on MediaCMS https://mediacms.io/ which is a free, open source 
streaming platform developed and maintained by Greek anarchists -- it's robust 
and versatile and I highly recommend it if you're thinking of hosting your own 
video streaming instance.

Florian is correct -- Critical Commons was designed for scholars and educators 
to share media or embed in electronic publications -- it's also true that the 
10,000+ unlicensed media files currently streaming are mostly commercial 
content, but that's just what our base of 10K+ registered users have uploaded. 
It's a core provision of CC's safe harbor that I do not moderate or limit what 
gets uploaded, so there's nothing stopping this community from uploading 
alternative content as long as it is transformed by critical commentary. 
There's also nothing stopping users from uploading media that they own the 
rights to, but you can use any streaming service for that.

To maximize the fair use justification, the general rule is to upload only as 
much as needed to make your point -- in some cases this could be a complete 
short work, which is more difficult to justify -- but this is entirely in the 
hands of the uploader. On a related note, I would encourage this community -- 
and all others -- not to adopt the language of "piracy" to describe uses that 
are fair and legal and do no harm to creators.

To add content to Critical Commons, all that is needed is an Advanced User 
account and a note to me via the contact form:
https://criticalcommons.org/accounts/signup/
https://criticalcommons.org/contact

I try to screen out lawyers and trolls when approving Advanced status, so just 
let me know who you are or what you want to do via the contact form.

Steve

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Florian Cramer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Peertube for experimental filmmaking?
To: Experimental Film Discussion List 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>

Hello Pip, Quentin,

Criticalcommons seems to be a scholarly site for film analysis that provides 
commented (commercial) film snippets based on fair use regulations. Odyssee.com 
seems to be a somewhat questionable startup that sells its video hosting 
service as being blockchain-based although the actually streaming is done 
through Bittorrent.

Regarding the use of copyrighted films on Peertube, since it's a decentral 
network, moderation policies are up to the individual server/instance. It is 
entirely possible to run a Peertube instance that (a) honors copyright and (b) 
is focused on experimental film and video work.

Maybe the third option would be to upload videos on 
archive.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://archive.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKopeKiJ5I$>
 . It has a working video hosting infrastructure, is a non-profit and involves 
people like Rick Prelinger. However, as a single organization and single 
provider, it's potentially also a single point of failure.

-F

--
blog: 
https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://pod.thing.org/people/13a6057015b90136f896525400cd8561__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKosdDZUdZ$>
bio:  
http://floriancramer.nl<https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://floriancramer.nl__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKot5w-8IO$>


On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 4:44 PM Quentin Darcq 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello Florian, Pip and everyone

Do you think Criticalcommons.org or 
https://odysee.com/<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://odysee.com/__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKorM7Ws6J$>
 might be good alternative ? Maybe the first one, Criticalcommons ?

Quentin

On Sun, Nov 20, 2022 at 3:59 PM Pip Chodorov 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Florian,

I do not have any experience with Peertube except that it is where I found 
hosted a wealth of pirated content by experimental filmmakers whom I 
distribute, culled from our DVD editions and others. It was quite difficult to 
remove (because anyone can post anything there). At least when we find pirated 
content on YouTube, we can flag it and it is removed immediately. It is a sad 
game of whack-a-mole that has to played regularly in order to protect author’s 
rights (though I have nothing against those filmmakers who feel flattered to be 
pirated, it is difficult to sell their DVDs in that case).

I am sensitive to your concerns about Vimeo, though practically it is still a 
good technical solution for hosting videos.

The mobile app I developed for Re:Voir last year (“Re:Voir Online”) is a 
platform for us to allow people to see the films we distribute in the case that 
they have no DVD player, or live in a place where it is hard to find DVDs, and 
do not mind watching films on their phone or tablet. It does a service for 
those viewers as well as for the filmmakers wishing their films to be seen more 
widely. It is also possible for us to host films that we have not published on 
DVD, and there are currently quite a few films on the app that are not 
available on other media. Sometimes we want to distribute films for which a DVD 
edition would not be justified. Of course this is a proprietary app that 
requires a distribution agreement with Re:Voir, but for some this could be a 
useful solution. I imagined opening part of it up to create what could be 
called an “internet filmmakers’ cooperative” but this will have to wait until 
there are enough subscribers for the app to be economically self-sufficient. 
All this to say: you are welcome to submit your films to us for distribution if 
you want your films online to be monetized.

Since I founded FrameWorks, I have been interested in online solutions for 
filmmakers to connect and share their work, but I do not believe there is an 
open source initiative for experimental films. It could have been Ubu, except 
that they were also pirating our content. Let us know if you find anything!

Pip Chodorov

> On Nov 20, 2022, at 11:27 PM, Florian Cramer 
> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
> Do other people here have experiences with Peertube and can recommend 
> friendly servers/'instances'? Or are there even Peertube instances run by 
> people from the Frameworks community?
>


--
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKoglgUH7h$>
--
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKoglgUH7h$>
--
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org__;!!LIr3w8kk_Xxm!q3xpR8zFzR2MnvMCqLPGwg9kATGoMeNQ9SK2kROuVVTNpp9217KpKmqGZh-mFZx4Umenx7wP-UpKoglgUH7h$
-- 
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

Reply via email to