I use a Sekonic L-208, which comes with a cold-shoe mount and fits comfortably 
on top of the Bolex. It’s an incident meter, but the diffuser slides away and 
it can operate as a reflected light meter as well. It’s kind of like a 
dumbed-down version of the Studio Deluxe, and I find it’s pretty simple and 
very fast to get a reading. It only has photo camera speeds marked, but since a 
Bolex shutter is 1/65th of a second at 24fps (right?), the mark at 1/60 is a 
fair approximation.

The only down side is that the right-side button is a little hard to access 
when it’s mounted on the camera, but otherwise it’s great — and relatively 
cheap. If you had a 90-degree shoe adaptor to mount it sideways, it would be 
even better.

-Nathaniel


> On Apr 24, 2023, at 4:32 AM, Todd Eacrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> There are a plethora of modern shoe-mount meters out there, but they're 
> generally designed for view- or range-finder 35mm still cameras (Leica, etc) 
> and too wide to fit on a Bolex. 
> 
> Not exactly "modern," but how about the 60-year-old Gossen-built purpose-made 
> Bolex meter? It sits in the cold shoe and is calibrated for the reflex light 
> loss. I still use one (accurate according to my fancy digital meter) and it 
> works as well as "sunny 16" when I'm in a hurry. 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2023, at 10:50 AM, Julian Antos wrote:
>> Does anyone have any recommendations for a small, modern light meter that 
>> could be mounted to a Bolex (or any other 16mm camera, for that matter)?
>> My current setup for my "home movies" is either a Sekonic Studio Deluxe II, 
>> which is wonderful and accurate but I still fumble around with if I need a 
>> reading in a hurry, or my iPhone with the Cine-Meter app, which is accurate 
>> enough for my purposes when calibrated to the Sekonic meter, but again is 
>> still a bit of a nuisance to use if I need a reading in a real hurry.
>> 
>> The answer is probably just that I should get quicker at using these 
>> devices, but it also seems that the perfect solution must have been devised 
>> for this. Also curious to hear what other people may be using.
>> --
>> Julian Antos
>> Chicago Film Society
>> www.chicagofilmsociety.org <http://www.northwestchicagofilmsociety.org/>
>> 773 827 8991
>> 
>>   
>> 
>> -- 
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org 
>> <https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org>
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Frameworks mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org 
> <https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org>
-- 
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

Reply via email to