Kind thanks Ryder.  

All very helpful, and great to see the test strips!

with appreciation, 

Sarah
http://www.SarahBlissArt.com






> On Nov 12, 2023, at 12:31 AM, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> Send Frameworks mailing list submissions to
>       [email protected]
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>       http://film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>       [email protected]
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>       [email protected]
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Frameworks digest..."
> Today's Topics:
> 
>   1. Re: advice on working with 3383 (Ryder White)
> 
> From: Ryder White <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] advice on working with 3383
> Date: November 12, 2023 at 12:30:17 AM EST
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> hi Sarah,
> 
> i’ve enjoyed shooting 3383 as a camera stock and processing as reversal in 
> the past - there are probably others here with a lot more valuable experience 
> than i have since i haven’t been doing much hand processing for the past few 
> years, but i’m glad to pitch in what basic knowledge i do have. i also found 
> this page in my notebook (from 3.5 years ago, yikes):
> 
> <IMG_0583.jpg>
> <IMG_0584.jpg>
> 
> 
> so like most print stocks, 3383 doesn’t have a factory rated ASA. i shot it 
> at approximately 3 ASA outdoors with an 85 filter. i wish i could better 
> remember my thought process behind that choice but it seemed to work out okay 
> from the test samples i found. iirc, the film is expecting to see artificial 
> light from a contact printer, so shooting in daylight without a filter yields 
> a very blue, flat image. anyway, trying to figure out exposures at this level 
> of sensitivity is kind of a roll of the dice…but print stocks seem to 
> tolerate overexposure pretty well so just bomb it with as much light as you 
> can. 
> 
> chemistry…yes E6 works. i used a similar kit made by tetanal. i think you’ll 
> probably want to buy the gallon kit, if the arista kit is like the tetanal 
> one, the indicated volume is the final mixed volume per solution, i.e. the 
> quart kit makes a quart of working solution of each of the first developer, 
> colour developer, and blix. be mindful that colour chemistry is a fair bit 
> more harmful/sensitizing compared to b/w chemistry, so i strongly recommend 
> good PPE and ventilation - and use extra caution with dried chemical spills 
> or drips. please forgive me if that’s already something you’re aware of! e6 
> is also very unforgiving with regards to temperature variation. i was 
> fortunate enough to have use of a tempering bath, but just as long as you 
> make sure your solutions are right on temp right before you pour them in, it 
> should be okay. you can always hold the film in a water wash before moving to 
> your next stage if you need to warm something up or cool it down. 
> 
> remjet - correct, no remjet removal needed. however, the stock incorporates 
> some dyes in the antihalation layer that are removed in process, so wash with 
> warm water very thoroughly before you begin until it comes out clear (it will 
> start purple). the first time i processed it this way i didn’t know that, so 
> i threw it straight in the first developer and turned my FD dark purple. 
> 
> i was trying to remember more about this whole process and came back across 
> kodak’s data sheet for 3383, which you may find interesting: 
> https://www.kodak.com/content/products-brochures/Film/VISION3_5219_7219_Technical-data.pdf
>  
> also worth mentioning that 3383 is an estar-base stock, so it’s good to keep 
> a scissors on you in case you end up needing to cut it because you won’t be 
> able to break it with your fingers. 
> 
> hope that works! have fun -
> 
> ryder
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Ryder Thomas White
> (he/him)
> SENT FROM MOBILE
> 
> 
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2023 at 10:14 Sarah Bliss <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> I’d like to try shooting and hand developing 3383, which I’ve not used 
>> before and am seeking advice and tips on shooting and developing.
>> 
>> What ASA is it rated?  
>> Do you use a filter of any kind?  
>> I’ve been advised to use an E6 kit to develop. Yes?  What size kit should I 
>> purchase to develop a couple of rolls? Would I need 4 of these quart sized 
>> kits, (to make a gallon), or do the solutions get mixed with water to total 
>> a gallon?
>> 
>> <Screenshot 2023-11-11 at 1.09.13 PM.png>
>> 
>> 
>> Arista E-6 Chemical Kit for Processing Slide Film 1 Quart
>> freestylephoto.com
>> <favicon.png>
>>  
>> <https://www.freestylephoto.com/11861-Arista-Rapid-E-6-Slide-Developing-Kit-1-Quart>Arista
>>  E-6 Chemical Kit for Processing Slide Film 1 Quart 
>> <https://www.freestylephoto.com/11861-Arista-Rapid-E-6-Slide-Developing-Kit-1-Quart>
>> freestylephoto.com 
>> <https://www.freestylephoto.com/11861-Arista-Rapid-E-6-Slide-Developing-Kit-1-Quart>
>>       <favicon.png> 
>> <https://www.freestylephoto.com/11861-Arista-Rapid-E-6-Slide-Developing-Kit-1-Quart>
>> 
>> 
>> I’m assuming that 3383 doesn’t have remjet, so no need for extra steps to 
>> remove that.  Is that correct?
>> 
>> Any other thoughts/tips you might have are most welcome!
>> 
>> thanks kindly, 
>> 
>> Sarah
>> http://www.SarahBlissArt.com <http://www.sarahblissart.com/>
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Frameworks mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org
> 
> 
> -- 
> Frameworks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

-- 
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

Reply via email to