Hi

This thread reminded me of an installation- Field Cymbal Phase - I made many 
years ago using a timebase corrector. Alternating fields of a stick striking 
two cymbals alternately.  Presented on two monitors, it was shown once, at The 
Ferens Art Gallery, Hull UK. incidentely, I am originally from Crystal  Palace)

Best Wishes

Rob




> On 14 Aug 2025, at 19:03, Federico Windhausen <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello Jared & co.,
> Apologies if this message is out of sync with the current thread about this 
> topic. I only receive the delayed, digest version of Frameworks.
> I saw Crystal Palace at the Walter Reade cinema in New York in 2002. Because 
> the venue's video projector was not progressive-scan, the video's flicker was 
> quite visible. In 2011, I saw the video again, interlaced flicker intact, on 
> an old CRT monitor in Ernie Gehr's home studio in Brooklyn.
> That year, I wrote about the video for an article (to my chagrin, in the 
> print version, an editorial error led to the still images of the video's 
> flicker being omitted). Not long afterwards, Ernie debuted a new version, 
> once again at the Walter Reade theater. He had attempted to use alternative 
> digital effects to compensate for the lack of the flicker "artifacting" on 
> now-ubiquitous progressive-scan video projectors. (I recall a number of 
> freeze frames that lacked flicker and thus made the video seem more static 
> than it had previously been.) He wasn't able to achieve anything close to 
> what he'd done in 2002. We discussed this after the screening. He was pretty 
> unhappy with the results, and I shared his view that he hadn't yet found a 
> satisfying way to revise and remediate the original version. I haven't asked 
> him about since then. I am sure he would also be very interested to know if 
> anyone has figured out how to preserve the flicker via contemporary digital 
> video media.
> best,
> Federico
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2025 13:14:26 -0500
> From: jared ashburn <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> To: Experimental Film Discussion List <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> Subject: Re: [Frameworks] field-level processing in video
> Message-ID:
>         <CACFi8AVqrK=v6rosxftcxo-gwuapzhc+p_hk9e+uf9epdjp...@mail.gmail.com 
> <mailto:v6rosxftcxo-gwuapzhc%2bp_hk9e%2buf9epdjp%[email protected]>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> Mark, Adam, Michael, and Robert,
> 
> I saw "Crystal Palace" at some point, but couldn't remember the title. It
> was that one that provoked my question, so thank you for reminding me. I'm
> seeing it described as "An ode to digital interlace, which is to video what
> intervals between frames are to film…". Do you happen to remember if it was
> displayed on a CRT? I'm trying to figure out the title of the other one you
> mentioned, and I do wonder if (and how) he managed to resolve the transfer
> to a progressive format. I stumbled upon the same kind of field flicker in
> FCP at about the same time he made "Crystal Palace" and was only able to
> capture the output through rescan. I think a VTR (analog without an
> internal TBC, maybe?) and a display that doesn't deinterlace by default
> might work to preserve the field flicker, but I'm not certain. I also don't
> know if that could then be transferred to a digital format (tape or file)
> without it being deinterlaced at some point. Even if it were, as Adam
> points out, most all digital projectors (and LCDs) would deinterlace and
> apply frame interpolation, which would kill the flicker. To Robert's point,
> perhaps field-based effects are best left to the analog domain. Still, even
> there, it required a special instrument (Rutt/Etra or the Vasulkas Digital
> Image Articulator —a hybrid device). Michael, I am unfamiliar with Yalkut's
> work that you mentioned. I'd be interested to know, and VERY curious to
> know what instruments he used. Thank you all for your input. I appreciate
> it. -Jared
> 
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2025 at 2:45 PM Robert Harris <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> 
> > The person who most formally, thoroughly, and passionately immersed
> > themself in the video field, in the formative instant of image generation,
> > was video maker/filmmaker Al Robbins, working with portapak, reel to reel
> > video in 1973 and after.
> > Given the fragile, uncopyable nature of his tapes, and given the generally
> > galleryizing world of video in the mid 70’s, Al’s work was tragically under
> > appreciated.
> > Rather than look to filmmakers who had no interest in analog video, you
> > should pursue your Vasulka thread, and look to the individuals associated
> > with the Experimental Television Center in Owego, NY. Founder Ralph Hocking
> > is deceased, his wife and collaborator Sherry Hocking Miller is still
> > around. Seek out Peer Bode, Hank Rudolph, David Jones, Neil Zussman.
> > But for the original artist with absolute investment in the glitch and all
> > its implications, Al Robbins.
> >
> >
> >
> > Robert Harris, Professor
> > Fitchburg State University
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Aug 9, 2025, at 12:13 AM, jared ashburn <[email protected] 
> > > <mailto:[email protected]>>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone know if Ken Jacobs, Ernie Gehr, or any other artists besides
> > Woody and Steina Vasulka have worked at the level of the video field? I’m
> > particularly interested in practices that manipulate fields (1/60 second in
> > NTSC), whether for timing-based image alteration or for preserving
> > field-specific flicker phenomena. Thanks!
> > > --
> 
> -- 
> Frameworks mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

-- 
Frameworks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.film-gallery.org/mailman/listinfo/frameworks_film-gallery.org

Reply via email to