It was just a shot in the dark. I see your points. Thanks. I will go back to plan A.
It has to do with using various found footage (A wind) in a montage context involving double perf camera original B-wind. It won't be the first time I have had to make back to back and belly to belly splices. I don't give a damn because there will also be painting on the back- side in this zombie jamboree. Myron Ort On Oct 21, 2011, at 3:46 PM, Jeff Kreines wrote: > Wouldn't it be easier to modify the device that requires double- > perf film -- assume it is an optical printer or projector -- to > accept single perf film? Far less traumatic to the film.? > > It would be difficult to design a reperforator because film shrinks > at different rates, as does the size of the perforation. > > > On Oct 21, 2011, at 4:53 PM, Myron Ort wrote: > >> Anyone know of an accessible tool, machine, or service whereby I can >> add a set of perforations to 16mm single-perforated prints , thus >> rendering them double-perforated ? > > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks > _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
