T
On 2/17/12, Ken Paul Rosenthal <kenpaulrosent...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Nicky, >>Are these the same kits we're talking about? You mentioned re-exposure at >> one point, but the current Tetenal four bath one litre kit: 1st Dev, Blix, >> 2nd Dev, Stabiliser, does not require re-exposure. This is the one I have >> used to do up to six rolls of Super 8 perfectly. Tetenal don't recommend >> extending dev time beyond the volume the kit is stated to be able to do. > Re-exposure is necessary in any reversal process, so that the remaining > halides that were not exposed/developed for the initial negative image, can > be exposed to light, then processed to a positive image in the 2nd > developer. The kits make the process simple and accessible for the average > 35mm still photographer by combining the steps. So, the 2nd Developer step > chemically 're-exposes' the remaining halides from the 1st Developer step, > and *also* develops it. Similarly, the Bleach/Fix (Blix) step combines the > Bleach and the Fix in one step. Hence, 6 steps become a more manageable 4. > Kenwww.crookedbeautythefilm.com (Academic)www.crookedbeauty.com > (Public)www.kenpaulrosenthal.com _______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
