Well it certainly would have been interesting to hear George Kuchar's take on 
WAVELENGTH. In my experience he always had these funny contrarian takes on 
"avant-garde" films. I never sat down and had discussions with him about this 
but he would often throw out these one-liners that were hilarious. For example, 
about Rose Lowder's "Bouquet" films, "Oh. Really nice color in those movies." 
About a Nathaniel Dorsky film with lots of very dark shots, "I'll have to bring 
my night vision goggles next time." About Jeffrey Skoller's "The Malady of 
Death" (relayed by Skoller): "Whatever it is you did, Jeff, it couldn't have 
been that bad." Say these lines to yourself in your best G. Kuchar voice and 
you'll see what I'm talking.

No doubt that George knew this stuff as well as anyone. But it is really his 
irreverence and his refusal to take anything in life too seriously that I find 
to be the most inspiring about this amazing man...

Steve Polta



--- On Sun, 3/4/12, gregg biermann <mubba...@optonline.net> wrote:

From: gregg biermann <mubba...@optonline.net>
Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Kuchar on the Oscars
To: "Gene Youngblood" <ato...@comcast.net>, "Experimental Film Discussion List" 
<frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>
Date: Sunday, March 4, 2012, 5:28 AM


  
    
  
  
    Yes, Yes. That was it. Thanks Gene.

    

    On 3/3/2012 3:06 PM, Gene Youngblood wrote:
    
      
      
        
          Gregg, the diary you’re thinking of is “Low Light Life”
            (1988). George walks into a room at SFAI where Ken Jacobs is
            conducting a seminar, looking for food. Ken is extremely
            rude to George, insulting him in front of the students, and
            George walks out. It’s an embarrassing scene, not unusual
            for Ken, but it’s nevertheless interesting since it was at
            Ken’s loft in NYC that the Kuchar brothers first showed
            their films to the New York underground crowd. Yes, George
            loved the films he caricatured, and his stance is never
            condescending (the same cannot be said for his pal John
            Waters, by way of comparison). George’s knowledge of
            Hollywood film history was amazing, and his film and
            soundtrack collections were legendary, but he loved all
            kinds of movies. A few years ago Film Comment asked some
            well known filmmakers to list their top ten favorite movies.
            On George’s list were titles you would expect, but he also
            included “Wavelength” and Antonioni’s “Eclipse.”
          
            
               
              
                From: gregg biermann
                
                Sent: Saturday, March 03, 2012 8:32 AM
                To: Experimental
                    Film Discussion List 
                Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Kuchar on the
                  Oscars
              
            
             
          
          The other thing here is that
            George's position on the mainstream commercial cinema was
            not purely oppositional -- that there is also some sense of
            homage to it in his work.  You could even argue that he was
            alienated to some degree when it came to the avant-garde
            film community -- even as it embraced him. I remember in one
            of his diary pieces he documents a little lecture by Ken
            Jacobs at SFAI that he attended and he ends up walking out
            with Ken yelling after him "George, Come back here!"  Then
            he ends up at some party in Hollywood sitting on a couch
            with Nicolas Cage (or some star like that)  and he ends up
            feeling uncomfortably out of place there as well. Cannot
            remember the title -- sometime around 1991.

            G

            

            

            On 2/29/2012 8:43 AM, sc...@financialcleansing.com
            wrote:
            
                Sorry, Fred, here I disagree with you.
                

                  
                I'm sure the Hollywood folks could have added
                    many other people (many of them worthy) to the list
                    of those recognized in that memorial moment, too.
                    But that three of those recognized--George Kuchar,
                    Tim Hetherington, and Ricky Leacock--are makers who
                    worked outside Hollywood, as independents, is
                    certainly cause for celebration. It means that, in a
                    however limited way, independent filmmakers are
                    being recognized more broadly, as they so rightly
                    deserve. That Saint Mark Toscano, working at the
                    Academy, has seen to the preservation not only of
                    Brakhage's films but Robert Nelson's, and the work
                    of so many other independents is part of that same
                    recognition.
                 
                Like it or not, the Academy is one of few
                    organizations devoted to cinema that has the clout
                    to provide broad recognition, and I was thrilled to
                    see their images on my TV screen on primetime Sunday
                    night. Kudos to the Academy for recognizing Kuchar,
                    Hetherington, and Leacock.
                

                  
                Scott

                
                
                  -------- Original Message
                    --------

                    Subject: Re: [Frameworks] Kuchar on the Oscars

                    From: "Fred Camper" <f...@fredcamper.com>

                    Date: Tue, February 28, 2012 7:44 pm

                    To: "Experimental Film Discussion List"

                    <frameworks@jonasmekasfilms.com>

                    

                    > Yes ­ Owen Land, Ricky Leacock, and Jordan
                    Belson as well.

                    

                    Oh, why not Hollis Frampton, and Stan Brakhage, and
                    Gregory J.

                    Markopoulos? Or Oscars to Ernie Gehr and Bruce
                    Baillie, who are among the

                    living?

                    

                    Or, one might ask, how likely is any of that?

                    

                    In all seriousness, am I the only one who finds the
                    many posts in this

                    thread a little bizarre?

                    

                    I thought it was nice when Brakhage was briefly
                    acknowlwedged in the Oscar

                    montage, and it's nice when other experimental
                    filmmakers are acknowledged

                    too. But when we start talking about awards, have we
                    forgotten what the

                    Oscars are, and what values they represent, and how
                    different the values

                    of avant-garde film are? Why should we expect, or
                    even want, more than a

                    passing nod from the Academy as it is currently
                    constituted? It's really

                    great that the money from the Oscar-cast goes to
                    film preservation,

                    including of avant-garde work. Is there any reason
                    to expect more?

                    

                    Fred Camper

                    Chicago

                    

                    _______________________________________________

                    FrameWorks mailing list

                    FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com

                    https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

                  
                
              

              
              

              _______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

            
            

            
            
            
            _______________________________________________

            FrameWorks mailing list

            FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com

            https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

            
            
            
            No virus found
              in this message.

              Checked by AVG - www.avg.com

              Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2114/4848 - Release
              Date: 03/03/12
          
        
      
      

      
      

      _______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

    
    

  


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to