Heath -
                Interesting inquiry. I will mention simple static electricity, 
which of course is NOT "non-light electromagnetic energy" but has been an issue 
with film for a long time - if you load your own film (ie, load raw stock into 
magazines or daylight reels in a dark room or black bag) there has always been 
the possibility of accidentally creating static electricity. This sparking 
creates tiny lightning-like flashes on the film. Whatever else you shoot later 
is there, too, but superimposed on it are those delicate little traces of 
"lightning bolts." When you don't want them they are a drag, but sometimes they 
are quite lovely.
                Also, if you haven't already seen it I highly recommend 
"Radiophobia," a documentary about Chernobyl and Pripyat. I believe it was made 
on the occasion of the 20th anniversary, so probably came out in 2006 or 
thereabout.

                - Tom Whiteside

Durham Cinematheque
Durham, NC       USA

From: FrameWorks [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Heath Iverson
Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 8:45 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Frameworks] "The Toxic Camera" query

Dear Frameworkers,

I'm a doctoral candidate working on contemporary British artists' cinema. At 
the moment I'm doing some research on Jane and Louise Wilson's "The Toxic 
Camera," an installation which, in part, commemorates the nuclear accident at 
Chernobyl. The installation is framed as a response to Vladimir Shevchenko's 
film, "Chernobyl: A Chronicle of Difficult Weeks". Filmed in the immediate 
aftermath of the accident, Shevchenko's film was damaged by the ambient 
radiation--leaving the film's emulsion visibly pockmarked by the collision with 
decaying atomic particles. At various points, the Wilson's digital video seems 
to simulate the material damage in the Shevchenko film--sometimes literally 
mimicking a pocked marked emulsion, other times apparently "translating" this 
analogue damage into other digital distortions in the image.

My question: does anyone know how these digital effects were technically 
achieved? Obviously, there are all kinds of digital filters that emulate a 
"film look," but I would like to know exactly what the Wilson's process was in 
production of their video's effects. Perhaps someone has their contact 
information?

A secondary question: Can anyone point me to any other films in which the 
emulsion registers non-light electromagnetic energy, that is, radiation outside 
the visible spectrum. I can think of certain films that intentionally make use 
x-ray photography, but I'd be interested in other examples, especially in 
accidental instances.

Best wishes,
Heath
--
Heath Iverson
PhD Candidate in Film Studies
University of St Andrews
99 North Street
St. Andrews, KY16 9AD
Scotland, UK

_______________________________________________
FrameWorks mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks

Reply via email to