On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Scott Dorsey <klu...@panix.com> wrote:
> Why do this?
Long long ago it was easy to get 16mm workprint of 35mm camera negative (at LA
labs like CFI). Blow-up workprint? Not a common thing. As Alain suggested,
Metropolis was one of the labs specializing in direct blowups to print, but I
believe he’s also correct in saying that Jack doesn’t do traditional opticals
At the risk of being heretical, if you want to see this S16 footage on a big
screen, you could do a high quality scan and project it digitally. Apparently
that’s the coming thing unless your initials are QT.
FrameWorks mailing list