On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:50 PM, Scott Dorsey <klu...@panix.com> wrote:

> Why do this?  

Long long ago it was easy to get 16mm workprint of 35mm camera negative (at LA 
labs like CFI).  Blow-up workprint?  Not a common thing. As Alain suggested, 
Metropolis was one of the labs specializing in direct blowups to print, but I 
believe he’s also correct in saying that Jack doesn’t do traditional opticals 

At the risk of being heretical, if you want to see this S16 footage on a big 
screen, you could do a high quality scan and project it digitally.  Apparently 
that’s the coming thing unless your initials are QT.

Jeff Kreines

FrameWorks mailing list

Reply via email to