Well, that would mean that you were approx 2 stops underexposed, so you could try for a push-4 in the 1st developer, which is a little off the charts. It might be worth shooting another roll with the same exposures (rate at ISO 200, meter and expose according to the meter), and then test development times using 10 ft strips. That would really be the only way to know for sure, as a push-4 means your exposure was in the toe-area of the characteristic curve (underexposed, ie most of what you exposed for would be in the shadow area under regular development - you would only see highlights as mid-tones, and mid-tones as shadow, shadows as full black).
What chemistry are you trying to use? I can try to lookup times for regular processing (as reversal) and extrapolate from there. -Jason Halprin Jason Halprin jihalp...@gmail.com On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:59 PM, Morgan Hoyle-Combs <mhoyleco...@yahoo.com> wrote: > Well, the thing is I've already shot some indoors using a sekonic light > meter. The ISO was 200 so I opened it up all the way to 1.9 and shot > everything from 8 to 16 fps in the hopes to absorb more light. There were > even moments I shot everything with a hand crank. > > Perhaps I would need clarification on what I should do next? > > Thanks. > >
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list FrameWorks@jonasmekasfilms.com https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
