Hollywood Flatlands: Animation, Critical Theory and the Avant-garde by Esther Leslie
<https://books.google.cz/books?id=dhrYWYZWETIC&printsec=frontcover&hl=cs&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0> best kerstin > On 18. Aug 2020, at 6:53 PM, Francisco Torres <[email protected]> wrote: > > I guess Bazin and Kracauer were not much into animation. Deleuze much less. > > 2020-08-16 17:42 GMT-04:00, Cecilia Dougherty <[email protected]>: >> I know, Francisco! c >> >> On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 2:03 PM Francisco Torres <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> when i was in film school it used to bother me that in most film >>> theory books animation was not even mentioned, as if it did not exist >>> or as if it was not part of cinema at all. then i thought that all of >>> cinema is animation, the camera breaks down the image into frames, >>> then the projector screens it giving the illusion of continuity. so >>> all film theory is abour animation. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> FrameWorks mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cecilia Dougherty >> https://www.ceciliadougherty.com/ <http://www.ceciliadougherty.com> >> https://drift.ceciliadougherty.com/ <http://inbetweentheories.com> >> https://paleolithic.ceciliadougherty.com/ >> <https://microscopegallery.com/platform/> >> > _______________________________________________ > FrameWorks mailing list > [email protected] > https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
_______________________________________________ FrameWorks mailing list [email protected] https://mailman-mail5.webfaction.com/listinfo/frameworks
