I think OID should be truly unique in the world as to make it easier for
replication. If OID are real unique number (not in a table, not in a
database, but in the world) then replication can be easily built with
OIDs...
Cheers.
Franck Martin
Network and Database Development Officer
SOPAC South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission
Fiji
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web site: http://www.sopac.org/
<http://www.sopac.org/> Support FMaps: http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/
<http://fmaps.sourceforge.net/>
This e-mail is intended for its addresses only. Do not forward this e-mail
without approval. The views expressed in this e-mail may not be necessarily
the views of SOPAC.
-----Original Message-----
From: Lincoln Yeoh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 14 May 2001 3:45
To: Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: [HACKERS] Re: 7.2 items
At 01:20 PM 10-05-2001 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Here is a small list of big TODO items. I was wondering which ones
>people were thinking about for 7.2?
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
4) Not really important to me but can serial be a proper type or something
so that drop table will drop the linked sequence as well?
Maybe:
serial = old serial for compatibility
serial4 = new serial
serial8 = new serial using bigint
(OK so 2 billion is big, but...)
5) How will the various rollovers be handled e.g. OID, TID etc? What
happens if OIDs are not unique? As things get faster and bigger a nonunique
OID in a table might just happen.
Cheerio,
Link.
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
