on 12/09/2010 02:14 Norikatsu Shigemura said the following:
> According to acpidump -dt, I could find CPU0CST table, but
> not found _CST.
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - -
> Scope (\)
> {
> Name (SSDT, Package (0x0C)
> {
> :
> "CPU0CST ",
> 0xDA9AB618,
> 0x000005CD,
> :
> })
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> - - - -
>
> Hum... ACPI CA 20100806 has a bug?
How do you conclude? Does a different version work?
It seems that our acpidump doesn't dump a dynamically loaded table.
That the table was loaded we can see from these messages:
ACPI: Dynamic OEM Table Load:
ACPI: SSDT 0 005CD (v01 PmRef Cpu0Cst 00003001 INTL 20061109)
--
Andriy Gapon
_______________________________________________
freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
