On Tuesday 02 November 2010 03:41 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > On Tuesday, November 02, 2010 3:29:01 pm Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 November 2010 11:29 am, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > on 29/10/2010 08:51 Andriy Gapon said the following: > > > > I guess that a general problem here is that it is incorrect > > > > to merely use memcpy/bcopy to create a copy of a resource if > > > > the resource has ACPI_RESOURCE_SOURCE field in it. > > > > > > Hans, > > > > > > could you please test the following patch? > > > > > > diff --git a/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c > > > b/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c index dcf101d..e842635 100644 > > > --- a/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c > > > +++ b/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_pci_link.c > > > @@ -767,6 +767,8 @@ acpi_pci_link_srs_from_crs > > > link->l_irq; > > > else > > > resptr->Data.ExtendedIrq.Interrupts[0] = 0; > > > + memset(&resptr->Data.ExtendedIrq.ResourceSource, 0, > > > + sizeof(ACPI_RESOURCE_SOURCE)); > > > link++; > > > i++; > > > break; > > > > Hmm... Very interesting. Can you please try this, too? > > Linux doesn't set the resource source bits up at all when doing > _SRS, so I'd rather just do that. I think what I'd prefer is that > we not use the prs_template, perhaps just save the type of the > resource and build a new resource object from scratch where the > resource is zero'd, the appropriate bits are set and then that > resource is appended to the buffer being built.
"Linux doesn't do it" is wrong if I am reading the spec. correctly, i.e., _CRS, _PRS and _SRS must have the same format and size. Jung-uk Kim _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
