on 02/11/2010 22:50 Jung-uk Kim said the following: > Yes, I understand. However, ACPICA is expecting the same size of > buffer *including* the optional parts if I am reading the code right.
Hmm, where is ACPICA doing that? I didn't see any connection between what *ACPICA* can return to OS in _CRS/_PRS and what OS can pass in _SRS. > Besides, I don't think there is any harm in doing the right > thing. ;-) I don't think that this is any "righter" than zero-ing out resource source description string. BIOS/firmware can't possibly use that for anything meaningful, IMO. -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
