On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Warner Losh <[email protected]> wrote: > Having chased boogiemen in this area before, I think this patch makes good > sense even though it breaks the device model a little. However, the hardware > in question really is special on x86... > > Warner
Sorry Warner, would you mind elaborating on the above? Do you mean that the patch moves to being too x86-specific for syscons handling? Sorry if I'm being too dense. -Brandon > On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:48 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Taku YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 00:31:33 +0900 >>> Taku YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> A patch is attached. >>> Mailman ate it ;) >>> Here it is. >>> >>> -- >>> -|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku >>> | __ < <[email protected]> >>> >>> - A chicken is an egg's way of producing more eggs. - >>> >> >> Throughout testing, I've seen zero regressions. In fact, an issue that >> existed prior to this patch involving minor screen corruption (dirty >> VGA buffers) is gone (Intel Mobile 965 Express). >> >> Thank you so much guys! >> >> -Brandon _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
