Taku YAMAMOTO <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe we have to tell the BIOS that we are going to utilize _CST via SMI. > In fact, the major difference between mine and jkim's is that in mine > I took the following snippet (which we can find in acpi_cpu_startup_cx > function, living in sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c) out of #ifdef notyet. > > -#ifdef notyet > /* Signal platform that we can handle _CST notification. */ > if (!cpu_cx_generic && cpu_cst_cnt != 0) { > ACPI_LOCK(acpi); > AcpiOsWritePort(cpu_smi_cmd, cpu_cst_cnt, 8); > ACPI_UNLOCK(acpi); > } > -#endif > > Vitaly, could you remove the above-mentioned #ifdef-#endif pair (to activate > the code inbetween) and test jkim's patch again?
It hangs on the same spot. >> Actually, I abandoned the patches and I am thinking about rewriting it >> from scratch, e.g., refactoring MI/MD support code >> (dev/acpica/acpi_cpu.c -> machine/machdep.c & acpica/acpi_machdep.c). >> Unfortunately, I don't have much time nor hardware to test, so it >> won't happen any time soon. Sorry. >> >> If anyone wants to pick it up from here, please feel free. > > [...] > > I will happily test your new patches next time. I'll provide any testing help needed as well. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
