on 10/07/2012 18:49 Sean Bruno said the following:
> On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 03:22 -0700, Andriy Gapon wrote: 
>> I would like to propose the following change for review and testing:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~avg/acpi_cpu_cx_lowest.diff
> 
> Very nice.  After a review I went ahead and applied it for testing.  All
> seems to be well on battery and A/C on my T520 so I'm very happy to see
> this go into the tree.
> 
> Let me know if you want me to do the man page update for acpi_cpu(4) 

Sean,

I would appreciate this a lot as I am currently a little bit busier than usual.

On a related note I also have this change for acpi.4:
--- a/share/man/man4/acpi.4
+++ b/share/man/man4/acpi.4
@@ -80,8 +80,12 @@ A scheduling algorithm will select states between
 and this setting
 as system load dictates.
 To enable ACPI CPU idling control,
-.Va machdep.cpu_idle_hlt
-must be set to 1.
+.Va machdep.idle
+should be set to
+.Li acpi
+if it is listed in
+.Va machdep.idle_available
+.
 .It Va hw.acpi.cpu.cx_supported
 List of supported CPU idle states and their transition latency
 in microseconds.

How does this look?
-- 
Andriy Gapon


_______________________________________________
freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to