on 24/12/2012 15:52 David Demelier said the following: > #6 0xffffffff806e81bf in calltrap () > at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:228 > #7 0xffffffff802c6f15 in AcpiUtUpdateObjectReference ( > Object=0xfffffe0001824a80, Action=0) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/utilities/utdelete.c:563 > #8 0xffffffff802b77a4 in AcpiExResolveNodeToValue ( > ObjectPtr=0xfffffe0001a2c2e0, WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/executer/exresnte.c:184 > #9 0xffffffff802b7ad3 in AcpiExResolveToValue (StackPtr=0xfffffe0001a2c2e0, > WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/executer/exresolv.c:124 > #10 0xffffffff802ac433 in AcpiDsEvaluateNamePath > (WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/dispatcher/dsutils.c:886 > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > #11 0xffffffff802aceef in AcpiDsExecEndOp (WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/dispatcher/dswexec.c:436 > #12 0xffffffff802c05ba in AcpiPsParseLoop (WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/parser/psloop.c:1249 > #13 0xffffffff802c10a8 in AcpiPsParseAml (WalkState=0xfffffe0001a2c000) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/parser/psparse.c:525 > #14 0xffffffff802c1d45 in AcpiPsExecuteMethod (Info=0xfffffe0033df8540) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/parser/psxface.c:368 > #15 0xffffffff802bb784 in AcpiNsEvaluate (Info=0xfffffe0033df8540) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/namespace/nseval.c:193 > #16 0xffffffff802bec91 in AcpiEvaluateObject (Handle=0xfffffe00017f7b80, > Pathname=0xffffffff8078229f "_BST", ExternalParams=0x0, > ReturnBuffer=0xffffff80d89ac960) > at /usr/src/sys/contrib/dev/acpica/namespace/nsxfeval.c:289 > #17 0xffffffff80309802 in acpi_cmbat_get_bst (arg=Variable "arg" is not > available. > ) > at /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cmbat.c:257 > #18 0xffffffff80309af8 in acpi_cmbat_bst (dev=0xfffffe0001936400, > bstp=0xfffffe008b319400) at /usr/src/sys/dev/acpica/acpi_cmbat.c:418 > #19 0xffffffff8045bd22 in devfs_ioctl_f (fp=0xfffffe001ba256e0, > com=3231990289, data=Variable "data" is not available. > ) at /usr/src/sys/fs/devfs/devfs_vnops.c:757 > #20 0xffffffff8053a23d in kern_ioctl (td=0xfffffe00039ae8e0, fd=Variable "fd" > is > not available. > ) at file.h:293 > #21 0xffffffff8053a4ad in sys_ioctl (td=0xfffffe00039ae8e0, > uap=0xffffff80d89acb70) at /usr/src/sys/kern/sys_generic.c:691 > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit--- > #22 0xffffffff806fc902 in amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffe00039ae8e0, traced=0) > at subr_syscall.c:135 > #23 0xffffffff806e84a7 in Xfast_syscall () > at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:387 > #24 0x0000000801d89c5c in ?? () > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > Before the panic, a lot of ACPI Error appears in dmesg like that : > > ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node > 0xfffffe00017f7b00), > AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) > ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xfffffe00017f7b00 > (20110527/exresnte-139) > ACPI Error: Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node > 0xfffffe00017f7b00), > AE_AML_NO_OPERAND (20110527/uteval-113) > ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xfffffe00017f7b00 > (20110527/exresnte-139) > > This happens on 9.1-RELEASE amd64
Could you please try a patch from a parallel thread: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.acpi/7562/focus=7611 ? -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
