Colin Percival wrote: > I've written (but not yet actually compiled or tested, so beware of typos) a > patch which I think makes sense.
It look good. But it seems to me the goal has been lost during discussion. It has been started because of unwilling interaction of LID close and ongoing shutdown, isn't it ? Unless I misunderstood the code, your patch seems to solve it for special case only: hw.acpi.lid_switch_state=S3 But what about Sx states for x -ne 3 ? I don't feel to be expert on ACPI code, thus it's possible those states are handled (=ignored) correctly as well. In such case ignore this message. Dan _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
