https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227191
--- Comment #20 from commit-h...@freebsd.org --- A commit references this bug: Author: avg Date: Thu Dec 6 12:34:34 UTC 2018 New revision: 341632 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/341632 Log: acpi_{Device,Battery}IsPresent: restore pre-r330957 behaviour Specifically, assume that the device is present if evaluation of _STA method fails. Before r330957 we ignored any _STA evaluation failure (which was performed by AcpiGetObjectInfo in ACPICA contrib code) for the purpose of acpi_DeviceIsPresent and acpi_BatteryIsPresent. ACPICA 20180313 removed evaluation of _STA from AcpiGetObjectInfo. So, we added evaluation of _STA to acpi_DeviceIsPresent and acpi_BatteryIsPresent. One important difference is that the new code ignored a failure only if _STA did not exist (AE_NOT_FOUND). Any other kind of failure was treated as a fatal failure. Apparently, on some systems we can get AE_NOT_EXIST when evaluating _STA. And that error is not an evil twin of AE_NOT_FOUND, despite a very similar name, but a distinct error related to a missing handler for an ACPI operation region. It's possible that for some people the problem was already fixed by changes in ACPICA and/or in acpi_ec driver (or even in BIOS) that fixed the AE_NOT_EXIST failure related to EC operation region. This work is based on a great analysis by cem and an earlier patch by Ali Abdallah <ali...@gmail.com>. PR: 227191 Reported by: 0mp MFC after: 2 weeks Changes: head/sys/dev/acpica/acpi.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-acpi-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
