On 6/5/05, Christian Weisgerber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Astrodog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If you aren't familier enough with something to evaluate it, you
> > shouldn't review it.
> On the other hand, the reviewer should be neutral, which in this
> area is strongly at odds with familiarity of the review subject.
It doesn't take long, on the lists, and reading docs, to be pretty
familier with FreeBSD.
> > I've done plenty of evaluations of software for customers of mine,
> > and I certainly don't just go through the install process, say "This
> > sucks" and move on to the next product.
> I'm sorry, but you are not in a position to judge your own review
> process. For that we need a third party observer. And for all I
> know, the producers of the software you evaluated might be aghast
> at your process.
I certainly can't say if my reviews are great or not. What I can say,
however, is that I don't just run the installer, and determine at that
point what the software is good for.
> > I'm aware writing a review is incredibly difficult, however, I would
> > suggest that one simply not write a review, if they are unwilling, or
> > unable to meet the standard required by the technical audience their
> > review is targeted at.
> Which is why reviews are written by those who don't have these
And why I'll continue to point out factual inaccuracies in said reviews.
> Christian "naddy" Weisgerber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"