Liam J. Foy wrote: >>It's just another vehicle for users to use. The more tools you give to >>people, they better off they are if they wish to use them. >> >>IRC does not have to have the stigma it seems to have. There are many >>decent users out there - and the efforts should not be dismissed - imho. > > > It's always the minority fucking it for everyone else. The FreeBSD view > also > keeps them away from IRC problems. I personally think the FreeBSD view is fair > and shows a true state of IRC these days. > > However, you must except people are not always going to head straight for > the handbook (you mentioned we ask a few simple things). It seems most > problems > in IRC arise from someone asking a simple question, and everyone thinking > they're cool to jump on the bang wagon and riducule. > > : http://www.freebsd.org/support.html > >>-- >>Best regards, >>Chris > >
While what you say has more truth then not, at least the website has changed some verbiage - and that's what I was hoping for to begin with. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/support.html#IRC In any event, we'll still continue to support the project there - no matter what the overall opinions are. -- Best regards, Chris If you are already in a hole, there's no use to continue digging. _______________________________________________ firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"