On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 10:57:53AM -0300, Sd??vtaker wrote:
> Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> > Source available
> > If bug fixes or enhancements later needed, can easily
> > Pay a consultant to do it, Global Index:
> > http://berklix.com/consultants/
> > Can choose Any competing consultant, not dependent on
> > just one software vendor who has access to closed source,
> > but may not consider it his priority.
> > Security, Peace of mind:
> > Code can be read by many, loopholes exposed & fixed,
> > not hidden & left open.
So . . . what exactly is the point of confusion? Those two compound
points seem like good enough reasons for using open source software, to
me, all by themselves -- at least for some people's needs.
> > 16,000 odd packages, mostly free from ports/ many not on MS.
> Yes, but you miss some great products sometimes... The one i can
> remember now is VMware, they not porting it to BSD only works in windows
> and linux, and the linux version got limited functionallity.
There's a lot of stuff you can miss in the commercial world, too.
Often, people choose open source software for reasons of idealism. I,
for instance, and not a huge fan of software patents and copyright
restrictions (which serve as a sort of intellectual prior restraint).
CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ http://ccd.apotheon.org ]
Marvin Minsky: "It's just incredible that a trillion-synapse computer could
actually spend Saturday afternoon watching a football game."
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"