I think what we're looking at here is that sysinstall should probably
be replaced... but it works well enough that it doesn't *have* to be
The virtue of sysinstall, however, is that it is console based. I for one
would rather endure sysinstall's idiosyncracies, if it still means that I'm
going to be able to reliably install on whatever ancient, eldritch hardware
I happen to have with me at the time.
If someone wants to write something X based, with hardware detection a la
Ubuntu, and all the proverbial bells and whistles and flashing lights, then
by all means; (and I think they already have, with finstall) but I think
FreeBSD absolutely needs to keep a console-based installer as a fallback for
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"