https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=207729
--- Comment #14 from Chris Hutchinson <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Konstantin Belousov from comment #13) > (In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #12) > After r296467, loader change is not critical, but desirable to have. If you > use old loader, some of your preloaded modules would not load, but kernel > does not panic. After the kernel booted, you can kldunload and then kldload > the failed modules. Thank you *very* much for the reply, Dimitry, Konstantin. So if I'm on anything (including 11) *prior* to the landing of r296467. A loader update *is* required. At least if one wants to expect *normal* behavior. At least that's how I interpret this. Thanks again! --Chris -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
