https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178357
Sofian Brabez <s...@freebsd.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|Open |Closed
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Sofian Brabez <s...@freebsd.org> ---
Hi Oleksandr. Wow 2013, thanks for doing the triage!
As John mentioned, the part about exposing them on linprocfs made sense. Since
I verified, it was implemented into sys/compat/linprocfs [1] with r317884 [2]
As Konstantin mentioned, it might break something in the other tier
architectures and it's not really needed as we have already alternatives to
gather CPU information.
Back in 2013, I remember my idea was to expose them through sysctl as MacOSX
does under machdep.cpu but we don't have this oid tree in FreeBSD.
I closed it.
[1]
https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/master/sys/compat/linprocfs/linprocfs.c#L298
[2] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=317884
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
