On Sun, 17 May 2009, Iain Hibbert wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2009, Iain Hibbert wrote: > > > Ah yes, my bad. I haven't properly looked at the manpage yet (I saw a > > spelling mistake earlier but I didn't note it :), > > found it,
actually, more :) iain Index: bluetooth.3 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/lib/libbluetooth/bluetooth.3,v retrieving revision 1.10 diff -u -r1.10 bluetooth.3 --- bluetooth.3 22 Apr 2009 15:50:03 -0000 1.10 +++ bluetooth.3 20 May 2009 08:17:03 -0000 @@ -115,13 +115,13 @@ .Ft void .Fn bt_devfilter_pkt_set "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t type" .Ft void -.Fn bt_devfilter_pkt_clt "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t type" +.Fn bt_devfilter_pkt_clr "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t type" .Ft int .Fn bt_devfilter_pkt_tst "struct bt_devfilter const *filter" "uint8_t type" .Ft void .Fn bt_devfilter_evt_set "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t event" .Ft void -.Fn bt_devfilter_evt_clt "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t event" +.Fn bt_devfilter_evt_clr "struct bt_devfilter *filter" "uint8_t event" .Ft int .Fn bt_devfilter_evt_tst "struct bt_devfilter const *filter" "uint8_t event" .Ft int @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ .Pp The .Fn bt_devinfo -function populates prodivded +function populates provided .Vt bt_devinfo structure with the information about given Bluetooth device. The caller is expected to pass Bluetooth device name in the @@ -383,7 +383,7 @@ .Xr bt_devopen 3 . The .Fa opcode -parameter is exppected to be in the host byte order. +parameter is expected to be in the host byte order. The .Fa param and _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bluetooth To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
