Hi [email protected]! On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 18:20:50 GMT; [email protected] wrote about 'Re: bin/155034: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info':
> Synopsis: [PATCH] dd(1) dies on SIGUSR1; should print info > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jh > State-Changed-When: Mon Jun 6 18:04:17 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > Not a bug. As far as I can see ignoring the signal would violate POSIX: > "For SIGINT, the dd utility shall interrupt its current processing, > write status information to standard error, and exit as though > terminated by SIGINT. It shall take the standard action for all other > signals; - -" The originator requested compatibilty shim with Linux dd, in fact: info dd: Sending an `INFO' signal to a running `dd' process makes it print I/O statistics to standard error and then resume copying. [...] On systems lacking the `INFO' signal `dd' responds to the `USR1' signal instead, unless the `POSIXLY_CORRECT' environment variable is set. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:[email protected] [Moderator of RU.ANTI-ECOLOGY][FreeBSD][http://antigreen.org][LJ:/nuclight] _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
