On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 10:10:08AM +0000, Jaakko Heinonen wrote: > The following reply was made to PR bin/160979; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Jaakko Heinonen <[email protected]> > To: Joe Barbish <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Subject: Re: bin/160979: 9.0 burncd error caused by change to cd0 from acd0 > Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 13:00:43 +0300 > > On 2011-09-24, Joe Barbish wrote: > > It seems that in 9.0 the cd/dvd/drive is now given a dev name of cd0 > > where in all previous releases it was acd0. > > Tried to use the system burncd command in 9.0 and got this error msg > > > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCGETBLOCKSIZE): Inappropriate ioctl for device > > > > Tested using "burncd -f acd0" and "burncd -f cd0". > > In both cases got the same error message. > > > > Looks to me like the burncd command needs to be fixed > > to work in 9.0. > > burncd(8) supports only acd(4) driver. In 9.0 the default is the new > CAM-based ATA stack which uses cd(4) (UPDATING entry 20110424). > > It's unlikely that a support for cd(4) will be added to burncd(8). > > I think this should be mentioned in release notes.
Can burncd(8) be easily modified to test for a CAM based ATA stack and output a helpful error message pointing the user at cdrecord? It would help avoid more people running into this problem. Thanks, Gary _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
