The following reply was made to PR kern/163076; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jaakko Heinonen <[email protected]> To: Dag-Erling =?utf-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <[email protected]> Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <[email protected]>, Petr Salinger <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected] Subject: Re: kern/163076: It is not possible to read in chunks from linprocfs and procfs. Date: Fri, 9 Dec 2011 16:35:30 +0200 On 2011-12-09, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Jaakko Heinonen <[email protected]> writes: > > As I wrote existing code depends on sbuf_len() to return the actual > > length regardless of the error status after sbuf_finish(). I am not > > willing to through all code using sbufs to check where it causes > > problems. phk@ asserts that r222004 is correct. > > What if the sbuf is in a state where asking for its length is > meaningless? Could you give an example about such state? Isn't the length first initialized to zero and then increased only when byte(s) has been successfully appended to the buffer? sbuf_len() has worked for unfinished buffers since r71724. -- Jaakko _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
