Fabian Keil <[email protected]> wrote
  in <[email protected]>:

fk> Hiroki Sato <[email protected]> wrote:
fk>
fk> > [email protected] wrote
fk> >   in <[email protected]>:
fk> >
fk> > de> I believe I have fixed this with in the refactor done in
fk> > de> r252388.  Please retest a newer -CURRENT version and let
fk> > de> me know if the problem still persists.
fk>
fk> I can confirm that the regression is fixed in r252388. Thanks.
fk>
fk> >  > It now enables authentication which reduces the available swap space.
fk> >
fk> >  More specifics about this?  This commit should not change the old
fk> >  behavior for encrypted swap space configuration.  If there is
fk> >  something wrong except for SIGSEGV, I would like to know what it is.
fk>
fk> When I wrote "now", I was referring to a system based on r252369.
fk> Authentication is no longer enabled by default after r252388,
fk> so this issue no longer exists either.

 Okay, that's good.  Thank you for your report anyway.  If you notice
 something wrong again, please let us know.

-- Hiroki

Attachment: pgpX34lF0Knyk.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to