The following reply was made to PR bin/166994; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: John Baldwin <[email protected]>
To: [email protected],
 [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: bin/166994: m4(1): m4&#39;s eval function ignores documented 2nd 
and 3rd arguments
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:34:51 -0500

 To be clear, the 'patched' state means "fixed in HEAD, but fix still needs to 
 be MFC'd".  If someone doesn't plan on merging it they mark a bug as "closed", 
 not "patched".
 
 That said, it is odd for someone to mark a bug as patched unless they are also 
 assigning it to themselves and assuming responsibility for merging it.  Tijl, 
 are you planning on merging the fix to at least stable/9?
 
 -- 
 John Baldwin
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to