https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=197337
Cy Schubert <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|New |In Progress --- Comment #2 from Cy Schubert <[email protected]> --- The question is, should /etc/rc.d/kdc be the correct file or should the krb5 ports use their own file? I could argue it both ways but we should look at existing and prior precedents such as, - named (when it was still in base), bind9X ports - sendmail (in base), sendmail (in ports), postfix, exim, etc... - ntp (in base), ntp (in ports), and ntp-devel - there are probably others that don't come to mind right now. I'd like to keep the approach consistent across all classes of software. Having said that, I can argue for ${LOCALBASE}/etc/rc.d/kdc if all other ports do the same or if that is our direction. I think a bigger discussion is needed to set the standard. Thoughts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
