https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212139
--- Comment #4 from Peter Wemm <[email protected]> --- FWIW; the thought experiment patch is wrong - it does not implement what I thought it did. I still think it is probably the best option though. The root of the problem is the read-ahead and we cannot trust size reporting. The old code did not do read-ahead. Preventing read-ahead from crossing the end of disk, or an alias of the end of disk should be more than sufficient to restore old behavior without adding new hard failure cases. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
