https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214885

--- Comment #2 from John Baldwin <[email protected]> ---
What version is this against?  Several of the new system calls are already
handled in truss in stable/11:

> egrep 
> '(openat|mkdirat|unlinkat|[lf]chmod|getdirentries|fstatat|pwrite|pipe2|pread|symlinkat)'
>  syscalls.c
        { .name = "fchmod", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 2,
        { .name = "fchmodat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 4,
        { .name = "fstatat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 4,
        { .name = "lchmod", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 2,
        { .name = "mkdirat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 3,
        { .name = "openat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 4,
        { .name = "pipe2", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 2,
        { .name = "symlinkat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 3,
        { .name = "unlinkat", .ret_type = 1, .nargs = 3,
                print_mask_arg(sysdecode_pipe2_flags, fp, args[sc->offset]);

In addition, due to the recent ptrace changes to return an accurate system call
argument count, system calls that accept no arguments or only plain integer
arguments (issetugid, dup, dup2, kqueue) should not need explicit descriptions
just to limit the number of arguments printed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to