https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218452
--- Comment #8 from Fabian Keil <[email protected]> --- The calcru complaints I'm getting don't depend on debug flags: sys/kern/kern_resource.c-914- } else { /* tu < ruxp->rux_tu */ sys/kern/kern_resource.c-915- /* sys/kern/kern_resource.c-916- * What happened here was likely that a laptop, which ran at sys/kern/kern_resource.c-917- * a reduced clock frequency at boot, kicked into high gear. sys/kern/kern_resource.c-918- * The wisdom of spamming this message in that case is sys/kern/kern_resource.c-919- * dubious, but it might also be indicative of something sys/kern/kern_resource.c-920- * serious, so lets keep it and hope laptops can be made sys/kern/kern_resource.c-921- * more truthful about their CPU speed via ACPI. sys/kern/kern_resource.c-922- */ sys/kern/kern_resource.c:923: printf("calcru: runtime went backwards from %ju usec " sys/kern/kern_resource.c-924- "to %ju usec for pid %d (%s)\n", sys/kern/kern_resource.c-925- (uintmax_t)ruxp->rux_tu, (uintmax_t)tu, sys/kern/kern_resource.c-926- p->p_pid, p->p_comm); -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
