https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219815
--- Comment #3 from Andrey V. Elsukov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to ecsd from comment #2) > I am glad to hear there are not volume restrictions, but I fail to see what > logging has to do with rules failing to fire when traffic that would trigger > them is known for a certainty to have entered the machine. I could say "log > deny" but if the rule never fires, then - ? And this issue asks what is > wrong that adding as much as a 2nd table to the mix causes the firewall to > start failing past the point (sequence number) where the 2nd table reference > is made. You can add `log` action to the `allow` rules. I suspect your first `allow` rules do match the packets that you want to be matched by `deny` rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
