https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=224270
--- Comment #5 from Jilles Tjoelker <jil...@freebsd.org> --- The pipefail option was proposed for POSIX at http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=789 but this discussion seems to be stalled. Apart from the SIGPIPE issue, it was pointed out that shell options interact poorly with functions since they are dynamically scoped (for example, set -o pipefail; cmd1 | cmd2 | cmd3; r=$?; set +o pipefail not only affects this pipe's exit status, but also everything done by cmd1, cmd2 and cmd3 if they are functions). I will try to get this moving again. However, the implementation of set -o pipefail is simple and doing without it or a similar feature in scripts is complicated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
