https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228574
--- Comment #3 from Mark Johnston <[email protected]> --- Looks like the binutils maintainers consider our use of _end to be a bug: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23161 I don't see how we can implement brk()/sbrk() without it though. Looking at glibc, they initialize curbrk using a seemingly undocumented kernel interface: on Linux, the brk() system call returns the current break address if the input break value is 0. Our SYS_break system call currently does not have a return value... perhaps the right solution here is to add a similar hack and use that in libc to initialize curbrk. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
