https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=230491
Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> --- Patch looks functionally ok to me (works because stat is a single-threaded program); has some style issues. It's unclear to me if we want to add caching to every individual tool accessing these databases, or if the caching should just happen in libc. One other concern that the thought of caching in libc raises is: how do we handle cache invalidation? Obviously we don't care if a user/group change races a running but ultimately bounded program like stat(1) across many files, but we probably do care if a daemon never sees renamed or numbered ids. Btw, it seems such caching is already implemented in libc via the NS_CACHING option. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
