https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=220246
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- I have not forgotten about this PR :) We're currently in a QA cycle for 11.2 (which I don't believe includes the RFC5424 support?), but once that's done I'll spin up a test machine on -STABLE and test it against logstash. Our plan is to switch to RFC 5424 style messages anyway when we move to 11.3 or 12.0 & that eliminates the need for this fix on our end & I'm fine hotfixing our local syslogd until then. I do see the logic in keeping RFC 3164 support as-is (since most folks will probably move to the new format) or making it a 12.0 item (since it introduces incompatibility with old syslogd). If it stays as-is that probably merits a note/erratum in the manpage for the next person who stumbles on this when they set up centralized logging in a heterogeneous environment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
