https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=234741
--- Comment #9 from Andriy Gapon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David Chisnall from comment #7) I think that the incorrect size is the problem. We use a size reported by BIOS or in a partition table as the size. In this case, most of the second disk would be inaccessible because of that. I think that that explains what you see. Also, it seems that we currently ignore the "asize" property in the vdev label. But even if we didn't, we could only warn that the "physical" size is smaller than the allocated size. (In reply to Toomas Soome from comment #8) Toomas, this is not a mirror, there are two top level vdevs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
