https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232527
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from [email protected] --- With the same options in src.conf, this also appears to affect the building of some ports under Poudriere as bsd.nls.mk is also blindly included by share/mk/bsd.lib.mk (releng/12.0 r340773 line 440). ===> Building for libsunacl-1.0.1 make[1]: "/usr/share/mk/bsd.opts.mk" line 101: warning: "NO_PROFILE is defined, but deprecated. Please use MK_PROFILE=no instead." make[1]: "/usr/share/mk/bsd.lib.mk" line 440: Could not find bsd.nls.mk make[1]: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/sysutils/libsunacl/work/libsunacl-1.0.1 *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/sysutils/libsunacl According to tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc (releng/12.0 r338929 line 6283), which is included by ObsoleteFiles.inc, usr/share/mk/bsd.nls.mk is considered optional (well, assuming my interpretation is correct) when NLS support is disabled therefor is deleted on a "make delete-old". .if ${MK_NLS} == no OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/nls/ OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/nls/C OLD_FILES+=usr/share/mk/bsd.nls.mk <-- this one here OLD_FILES+=usr/share/nls/C/ee.cat OLD_DIRS+=usr/share/nls/af_ZA.ISO8859-1 If this is the case, the file cannot be relied upon and should be .sinclude'd instead or unmarked as being optional in OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc. Probably the latter is the safer? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
