https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=219216
--- Comment #11 from Conrad Meyer <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Fabian Keil from comment #9) > While dd keeps a core busy as expected, rand_harvestq stays below 3% > cpu use according to top. > ... > > The fact that rand_harvestq is busy doesn't necessarily indicate that > the entropy pool is starved. True. On 12.0 through head, if you have concurrent random readers (especially 2+), rand_harvestq CPU time may just indicate it is spinning on the global Fortuna lock while a reader generates random data. Some more detail in my earlier comment #10. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
