Edward Tomasz Napierala <> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
                 CC|                            |

--- Comment #1 from Edward Tomasz Napierala <> ---
I've glanced at this, and it seems somewhat non-trivial.  The problem here is
that pseudofs(5), which is what linprocfs(5) uses underneath, does not support
nested PFS_PROCDEP directories; they trigger a KASSERT, and if you remove that,
you'll get a nested lock attempt.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to ""

Reply via email to