https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=244178

--- Comment #1 from Alan Somers <[email protected]> ---
In step 5, are you extending the underlying file from EOF onwards, or are you
rewriting the whole thing?  And in step 7, is the data correct up until the old
EOF, or is it all wrong?

Do you have a standalone test case that can demonstrate the problem?

It sounds to me like the correct answer might be for the fuse server to return
FOPEN_DIRECT_IO for every FUSE_OPEN request.  That would prevent the kernel
from using the cache at all.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"

Reply via email to