https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=250954
--- Comment #8 from Konstantin Belousov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michał Górny from comment #7) Actually not. Or rather, I updated your second example some more to query the list of threads on each stop, and for me it behaves exactly as I would expect it to behave: wait: pid=38618, waited=38618, ret=117f threads: 100447 tid = 100447, SIGSTOP set DR0=0x601878 (&g_val) on tid=100447 wait: pid=38618, waited=38618, ret=117f threads: 100447 100820 tid = 100447, SIGSTOP set DR0=0x601874 (&g_val2) on tid=100447 wait: pid=38618, waited=38618, ret=57f threads: 100447 100820 tid = 100820, SIGTRAP w/ PL_FLAG_BORN dr0=0x601878, g_val=0x601878, g_val2=0x601874 wait: pid=38618, waited=38618, ret=57f threads: 100447 100820 tid = 100820, SIGTRAP w/ PL_FLAG_EXITED thread started thread joined wait: pid=38618, waited=38618, ret=0 Now you set DR0 using explicit tid, and second PT_SETDBREGS only affects the main thread, while new thread 100820 inherits initial DR0. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
