https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251570
--- Comment #6 from Mark Millard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mark Millard from comment #5) By the way, for self hosted (not cross builds) I use the likes of: # Use of the .clang 's here avoids # interfering with other C<?>FLAGS # usage, such as ?= usage. CFLAGS.clang+= -mcpu=cortex-a72 CXXFLAGS.clang+= -mcpu=cortex-a72 CPPFLAGS.clang+= -mcpu=cortex-a72 ACFLAGS.arm64cpuid.S+= -mcpu=cortex-a72+crypto ACFLAGS.aesv8-armx.S+= -mcpu=cortex-a72+crypto ACFLAGS.ghashv8-armx.S+= -mcpu=cortex-a72+crypto This requires that the the implicit -march= value to be compatible with the host. (I've never faced a context with strongly related -march values, such as a -march=armv8-a host trying to compile to target -march=armv8.2-a instruction set extensions that an armv8-a would reject. TARGET and TARGET_ARCH are not that detailed but determine what is considered a cross-build in the build system.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
